P.C Act – All about sanction and its limitations
Check each one of them to know their areas of improvements. They can propel the team to move forward with their excellence in creative thinking. They see the bigger picture or view than anybody else in the team and does help a lot in minimizing risks caused by wrong or poor decisions. Innovators should prov ide a buffer for execution of their ideas. Since they have a tendency to jump into another idea without fully executing the first one, they could paralyze the team with not yet fully acted insights.
Two important questions of law arise for consideration in this appeal. The first question is whether an order of the Appointing Authority granting sanction for prosecution of a public servant under Section 19 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, , would be rendered illegal on the ground of acting as per dictation if it consults the Central Vigilance Commission for its decision. The further question in this context, is whether the criminal proceedings can be quashed if the decision is not taken within the mandatory period. The validity of the sanction would, therefore, depend upon the material placed before the sanctioning authority and the fact that all the relevant facts, material and evidence have been considered by the sanctioning authority. Consideration implies application of mind. The order of sanction must ex facie disclose that the sanctioning authority had considered the evidence and other material placed before it.
Hi, this is a comment. To get started with moderating, editing, and deleting comments, please visit the Comments screen in the dashboard. Commenter avatars come from Gravatar. Can I simply say what a relief to discover someone who really understands what theyre discussing on the internet.
